There were no explicit nor implicit endorsements in my efforts. An extension of reciprocal help, strictly stimulated by emerging skewed campaigning and the absence of level playing fields. Most important, cues indicated K was not seeking out WWIII and was leaning away from a protracted war in Europe. That said, on her own, she was surrounded by too many forces leaning towards massive warfare.
Add comment
Comments
Hi there! I stumbled upon your blog and I was reading through some of your work. In particular, one of your comments really caught my interest regarding Mr. Putin in which you seemed to be alluding to the idea that he would consider the nuclear option as a means of bringing about the biblical prophecy laid out in the book of relevations. This specifically caught my interest because I've actually had similar thoughts but relating to the current US administration and Israel; I think this notion of biblical prophecy and bringing forth the endtimes were in fact employed by the Trump campaign in an effort to reach his massive evangelical base, and may even be truly believed by people on his cabinet, like Pete Hegseth.
I'm curious what particularly made you attribute this theory to Russia, rather than the recently-elected theofascist regime in the US. A massive amount of Trump's base are evangelicals, who happen to be Christian zionists. The notion of a Christian zionist seems strange until you realize that the book of revelations lays out the jews' return to Israel as the beginning of the apocalypse, and this is literally specific scripture Trump has used to appeal to this base. A lot of people on his cabinet strike me as true fanatic believers as well, although I'm not too sure about he himself.
Curious what your thoughts are on this!